L’Autre asiatique chez Gabrielle Roy, Marguerite-A. Primeau, J. R. Léveillé et Annie-Claude Thériault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les communautés franco-canadiennes reconnaissent, du moins sur le plan discursif, le besoin de former de nouvelles solidarités interculturelles et d’intégrer de nouveaux savoirs, de nouvelles perspectives et attitudes et de nouveaux goûts, mais on pourrait bien se poser la question de savoir quels Autres peuplent l’imaginaire de leurs artistes littéraires. Étant donné l’importance pour la littérature d’expression française au Canada de l’oeuvre d’écrivains d’origine asiatique, dont, par exemple, Ying Chen, Kim Thúy, Ook Chung et Aki Shimazaki, cet article s’intéresse à l’Asiatique imaginaire chez des auteurs issus des francophonies à l’ouest du Québec. Dans le but de déterminer dans quelle mesure il serait possible d’inclure l’immigrant ou l’émigrant asiatique au chapitre des nouvelles solidarités imaginées au sein du Canada francophone, cet article interrogera quatre textes : « Où iras-tu Sam Lee Wong ? » de Gabrielle Roy, « Une veille de Noël » de Marguerite-A. Primeau, Le soleil du lac qui se couche de J.R. Léveillé et Quelque chose comme une odeur de printemps d’Annie-Claude Thériault.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".