MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945513230 · doi:10.1107/s2056989019006145

Bis[<i>S</i>-benzyl 3-(furan-2-ylmethylidene)dithiocarbazato-κ<sup>2</sup> <i>N</i> <sup>3</sup>,<i>S</i>]copper(II): crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis

2019· article· en· W2945513230 on OpenAlexaff
Enis Nadia Md Yusof, Nazhirah Muhammad Nasri, T.B.S.A. Ravoof, Mukesh M. Jotani, Edward R. T. Tiekink

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystal structures of chemical compounds
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersUniversiti Putra Malaysia
KeywordsCrystallographyCopperCrystal structureChemistryImineFuranRing (chemistry)Crystal (programming language)Atom (system on chip)Thio-Stereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title Cu II complex, [Cu(C 13 H 11 N 2 OS 2 ) 2 ], features a trans -N 2 S 2 donor set as a result of the Cu II atom being located on a crystallographic centre of inversion and being coordinated by thiolate-S and imine-N atoms derived from two dithiocarbazate anions. The resulting geometry is distorted square-planar. In the crystal, π(chelate ring)–π(furyl) [inter-centroid separation = 3.6950 (14) Å and angle of inclination = 5.33 (13)°] and phenyl-C—H...π(phenyl) interactions sustain supramolecular layers lying parallel to (\overline{1}02). The most prominent interactions between layers, as confirmed by an analysis of the calculated Hirshfeld surface, are phenyl-H...H(phenyl) contacts. Indications for Cu... Cg (furyl) contacts (Cu... Cg = 3.74 Å) were also found. Interaction energy calculations suggest the contacts between molecules are largely dispersive in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicCrystal structures of chemical compoundsFrench-language works237,207