MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945514147 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v14i2.373

Nous avons un décollage ! Le lancement de la Compétence par le design au Canada

2019· article· fr· W2945514147 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Leslie Martin, James Douketis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La transition vers l’image de marque du Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada de la formation médicale axée sur les compétences (FMC), intitulée “Competence By Design (CBD)”, débutera le 1er juillet 2019 pour de nombreux programmes de médecine interne, y compris les programmes de médecine interne de base et les programmes généraux de bourses de recherche en médecine interne. Pour de nombreuses personnes qui s’intéressent à la formation médicale postdoctorale, il s’agit d’un voyage vers l’inconnu. Pour faciliter cette transition, voici un bref résumé de la CBME pour ceux qui sont moins familiers avec les changements à venir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207