Baropodometric quantification and implications of muscle coactivation in the lower limbs caused by head movement: A prospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In healthy young adults, muscle coactivation can sometimes be induced by remote voluntary contractions when the motor task is forceful, maximal, tiring, or cyclic and brief. OBJECTIVES: To show that a change in plantar pressure is an unequivocal response to backward movement of the head, and to contribute to a better understanding of physiotherapy methods that involve remote muscle activation. METHODS: Involuntary coactivation was quantified as a percentage of the anteroposterior plantar pressure distribution, using a baropodometric platform in a population of young adults. The baropodometric data were collected from a 1s recording after 30 s in the reference condition, and from 1s recordings during the first second and then during the 120th second in the test condition. The results were analyzed with Bayesian statistics (Markov chains and Monte Carlo integration techniques). RESULTS: 90 adults participated in the study (age range: 19-26; 38 males and 52 females). The forefoot plantar pressure increased in all cases, by a mean multiplicative factor (on a logit scale) of 1.12 (from 72.24% to 74.45%) when the head was aligned over the trunk. CONCLUSIONS: This 90-participant trial confirmed our initial hypothesis: a increase in forefoot plantar pressure is a systematic response to the motor task (head movement), and suggests greater recruitment of the plantar flexor muscles. A spinal reflex and/or a previously unknown form of motor overflow might be involved in this phenomenon. These results support the development of inductive physiotherapy techniques based on remote muscle activation in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. CLINICALSTRIAL. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02320097.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".