MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945592312 · doi:10.29105/rinn12.24-4

Impact of international accreditation in the recognition of academic degrees in the domestic and foreign labor market. Case study: Civil engineering program

2017· article· en· W2945592312 on OpenAlexaff
José Barragán Codina, Daniel Bortoni Herrera

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Innovaciones de Negocios · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccreditationPolitical scienceWorkforceFace (sociological concept)CurriculumManagementHumanitiesSociologySocial scienceLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In a globalized era it is not enough to have a professional qualification to ensure economic and professional success. The academic background of professionals must be adequate to face challenges and solve problems of a globalized and dynamic world. Civil engineers face many complications when seeking an international career. There are many differences within the profession globally such as: resources, workforce, climate, language, culture, philosophies, regulations, etc. which raise the entry barriers to fully practice as a civil engineer. The International accreditations play a major role as the first evidence of the civil engineer technical proficiency. These assure the quality of the higher education curricula and add value to the human capital on an international context. Despite the fact that many Mexican Universities have academic programs which have international accreditations, civil engineer graduates cannot easily work across borders. This paper describes the impact that international accreditation has for civil engineers when seeking an international career.Keywords: accreditation, higher education, self-study, universitiesJEL: I23,I25, I28Resumen: En la educación global, no es suficiente el tener una calificación profesional para asegurar el éxito económico y profesional. La formación académica de los profesionales debe ser adecuada para enfrentar los retos y resolver los problemas de un mundo globalizado y dinámico. Los ingenieros civiles se enfrentan a muchas complicaciones en la búsqueda de una carrera profesional en el plano internacional. Hay muchas diferencias dentro de la profesión a nivel mundial, tales como: recursos, mano de obra, clima, idioma, cultura, filosofías, reglamentos, etc., que elevan las barreras de entrada para ejercer plenamente como ingeniero civil. Las acreditaciones internacionales desempeñan un papel importante como la primera evidencia de la capacidad técnica del ingeniero civil. Estos aseguran la calidad de los planes de estudios de enseñanza superior y agregan valor al capital humano en un contexto internacional. A pesar de que muchas universidades mexicanas tienen programas académicos que cuentan con acreditaciones internacionales, los graduados de ingeniería civil no pueden trabajar fácilmente a través de las fronteras. En este trabajo se describe el impacto que la acreditación internacional tiene para los ingenieros civiles en la búsqueda de una carrera internacional.Palabras clave: acreditación, auto estudio, educación superior, universidades

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Innovaciones de NegociosSame topicEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207