Classifying formulations of crosslinked polyethylene pipe by applying machine‐learning concepts to infrared spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Crosslinked polyethylene (PEX‐a) pipes are emerging as promising replacements for traditional metal or concrete pipes used for water, gas, and sewage transport. Understanding the relationship between pipe formulation and performance is critical to their proper design and implementation. We have developed a methodology using principal component analysis (PCA) and the machine learning techniques of k‐means clustering and support vector machines (SVM) to compare and classify different PEX‐a pipe formulations based on characteristic infrared (IR) spectroscopy absorbance peaks. The application of PCA revealed that a large percentage (89%) of the total variance could be explained by the first three principal components (PC1‐PC3), with distinct clustering of the data for each formulation. By examining the contribution of the individual IR bands to the PCs, we determined that PC1 could be attributed to different peroxide crosslinkers, whereas PC2 and PC3 could be attributed to differences in the additives. Using the PCA results as input to k‐means clustering and SVM resulted in very high accuracy of classifying the different pipe formulations. Our approach highlights the advantages of using PCA and machine learning techniques to characterize different formulations of PEX‐a pipes, which is important to achieve a detailed understanding of the pipe formulation and manufacturing process. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019, 57, 1255–1262
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".