MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Les méthodes de recherche du DBA

2018· book-chapter· fr· W2945668248 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Christophe Bogaert, Jean Moscarola, Caroline Mothe

Bibliographic record

VenueEMS Editions eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Organizational Studies
Canadian institutionsBureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce chapitre s’attache à décrire l’intérêt des archives historiques et de la narration dans le contexte d’une recherche longitudinale d’un cas unique couvrant les 25 années d’existence d’une entreprise de taille moyenne opérant à l’international dans le domaine de la biotechnologie industrielle. Il s’appuie sur une combinaison de méthodes qualitatives et quantitatives dans le but de rechercher de manière abductive des explications pour les événements observés en s’intéressant à l’influence des contextes sur les processus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0180.010
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMS Editions eBooksSame topicManagement and Organizational StudiesFrench-language works237,207