MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945731401

Experience With the Canadian Standards Association Offshore Structures Code

2006· article· en· W2945731401 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel Masterson, R. Frederking

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Submarine pipelineCode (set theory)Computer scienceGeologyOceanographyProgramming languagePsychologySet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) developed a comprehensive Offshore Structures Standard in the early 1990s. The Code has had limited use in Canada, but S471 General Requirements, Design Criteria, the Environment, and Loads has seen international application. The Code is performance-based; setting overall targets for reliability and provides specific guidance on achieving these targets. The provisions in the CSA Standard for ice loads have been reconciled with the Russian codes such as SNiP and VSN. A comparison of the codes has shown that they predict similar ice loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207