MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945772968 · doi:10.7202/1059419ar

Un théâtre en trois D dans l’Ouest canadien

2019· article· fr· W2945772968 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nicole Nolette

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, Nicole Nolette explore le potentiel du concept de « différenciation solidaire » pour l’analyse intertextuelle entre les littératures francophones de l’Ontario et de l’Ouest canadien. Les grandes figures des « trois D » de l’Ontario français (Patrice Desbiens, Robert Dickson et Jean Marc Dalpé), rejetées par la génération de Louis Patrick Leroux, réapparaissent dans la dramaturgie de Marc Prescott au Manitoba et de Gilles Poulin-Denis, originaire de la Saskatchewan. Nicole Nolette identifie les traces des trois D dans la langue, la route, la ville minière et les animaux représentés par Prescott et Poulin-Denis pour montrer comment la solidarisation littéraire de l’Ouest et de l’Ontario francophones peut également signifier une différenciation régionale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207