MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945803421 · doi:10.3917/ecorev.047.0164

Des vivants, des vins

2019· article· fr· W2945803421 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoRev · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En créant le Collectif Vin vivant, un projet hybride entre sciences humaines, arts plastiques et sciences du vivant, Emmanuelle Blanc, Denis Chartier et Aurélien Gabriel Cohen partaient de l’envie commune de « rendre sensible les réponses que des pratiques attachées à un territoire peuvent composer face à la crise écologique contemporaine ». Des réponses qu’ils situent avant tout dans un certain rapport au sensible et au vivant. Durant plusieurs années, ils ont arpenté les vignes, côtoyé les vignerons, créé et pensé en lien avec un territoire (une portion des vallées du Cher et du Beuvron) afin d’y démêler les rapports au(x) vivant(s) qui s’y jouaient durant la vinification. Le fruit de ce long travail d’observation, de création et d’analyse a été exposé du 12 au 16 janvier 2019 au théâtre d’Orléans. Ils reviennent pour nous sur cette exposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoRevSame topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207