La planificación gráfica en la performance artística contemporánea. Definición, notas sobre la propia obra y estudio de casos en Europa y Québec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el plan de esta tesis se formula una teoria analitica y de aplicacion practica en la que la performance se presenta como un proceso artistico interdisciplinar, creativo y complejo constituido por diversas fases temporales desarrolladas de forma sucesiva. A partir de este planteamiento, la investigacion se centra en la fase de preparacion de la accion concertada, considerando la planificacion de la misma como un recurso creativo, ludico e inventivo en el que se emplean dispositivos graficos como partituras, anotaciones, dibujos, diagramas o esquemas. Esta teoria se expone con el objetivo de expandir los limites de la performance hacia otros espacios versatiles de intervencion, desde la ideacion hasta la documentacion de la obra, en un transito creativo que incluye el antes, durante y despues de la accion artistica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".