La planificación gráfica en la performance artística contemporánea. Definición, notas sobre la propia obra y estudio de casos en Europa y Québec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[ES] En esta tesis se formula una teoría analítica y de aplicación práctica en la que la performance se presenta como un proceso artístico interdisciplinar, creativo y complejo constituído por diversas fases temporales desarrolladas de forma sucesiva. A partir de este planteamiento, la investigación se centra en la fase de preparación de la acción concertada, considerando la planificación de la misma como un recurso creativo, lúdico e inventivo en el que se emplean dispositivos gráficos como partituras, anotaciones, dibujos, diagramas o esquemas. Esta teoría se expone con el objetivo de expandir los límites de la performance hacia otros espacios versátiles de intervención, desde la ideación hasta la documentación de la obra, en un tránsito creativo que incluye el antes, durante y después de la acción artística.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".