Former Dominion Archives Building Seismic Upgrade Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The former Dominion Archives building at 330 Sussex Drive in Ottawa, Canada is a three-storey historic stone masonry building that was built in two stages between 1904 and 1924. The perimeter masonry walls form the lateral load resisting system of the building; however, the walls of the 1904 section were in poor condition with soft and deteriorated mortar, the terra-cotta flat arch floors of the 1904 section did not form a proper diaphragm system, and the floor diaphragms were not adequately anchored to the perimeter walls. This case study will present the seismic upgrade and retrofit work that was undertaken to extend the life of the building, including an innovative solution to restore the structural integrity of deteriorated stone masonry walls, providing new lightweight reinforced concrete topping floor diaphragms in the 1904 section and connecting the concrete floor diaphragms to the historic masonry walls with stainless steel grouted anchors.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it