Les jumelages interculturels : un espace de dialogue pour l’intégration des personnes issues de l’immigration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le présent article, après un rappel du contexte québécois de l’immigration et des formations à l’interculturel, nous présentons les objectifs et l’historique des jumelages interculturels, le cadre de référence, les aspects méthodologiques et la discussion sur les retombées des jumelages, lesquels initient des rencontres entre des étudiants immigrants qui apprennent le français langue seconde (FLS) à l’École de langues et des francophones inscrits dans différents programmes de formation à l’enseignement à l’UQAM. Les résultats de cette expérience montrent que ces jumelages développent les compétences de communication interculturelle des deux groupes en présence et qu’ils contribuent à nourrir la réflexion sur l’éthique du rapport à l’autre en éducation et en formation, plus spécifiquement à l’intégration harmonieuse des personnes immigrantes en contexte universitaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".