MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945866795 · doi:10.4000/communiquer.3929

Communication interculturelle et internationale : contributions à un champ d’études et de recherches en mouvance

2018· article· fr· W2945866795 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Caroline Bouchard, Caterine Bourassa-Dansereau, Sklaerenn Le Gallo

Bibliographic record

VenueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publique · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and cultural evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIntercultural communicationSociologyPhilosophyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons choisi d’intituler ce numéro spécial « Communication interculturelle et internationale : contributions à un champ d’études et de recherches en mouvance ». À la lecture de ce libellé, certaines personnes s’interrogeront : plutôt que d’articuler un numéro de revue autour de la communication interculturelle et internationale, ne devrait-on pas plutôt chercher à l’arrimer aux deux domaines d’études spécifiques que sont, d’un côté, la communication interculturelle et, de l’autre, la com...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0100.029
Scholarly communication0.0310.029
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publiqueSame topicLanguage and cultural evolutionFrench-language works237,207