MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945898070 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz047

L’accès universel à la contraception sans frais pour les jeunes du Canada

2019· article· fr· W2945898070 on OpenAlexaffabout
Giuseppina Di Meglio, Elisabeth Yorke

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGynecologyMedicineHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’accès opportun à une contraception efficace réduit l’incidence de grossesses non désirées. Le coût est un obstacle important à la contraception chez les jeunes du Canada. Bon nombre doivent payer leur contraception de leur poche puisqu’ils n’ont pas d’assurance médicaments, que leur assurance ne rembourse pas les contraceptifs qu’ils souhaitent prendre ou qu’ils désirent se procurer des contraceptifs à l’insu de leurs parents. Pour corriger ces obstacles et réduire le taux de grossesses non désirées, le présent document de principes recommande que tous les jeunes aient accès à la contraception confidentiellement et sans frais jusqu’à l’âge de 25 ans et présente des mesures pour réaliser cet objectif partout au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207