MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945937823 · doi:10.1080/23744731.2019.1622937

Semi-Analytical Method for <i>g</i> -Function Calculation of bore fields with series- and parallel-connected boreholes

2019· article· en· W2945937823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology for the Built Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholePipingDimensionless quantitySuperposition principleMechanicsHeat transferLine sourceThermalInletField (mathematics)Series (stratigraphy)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A semi-analytical method for the calculation of g-functions of bore fields with mixed arrangements of series- and parallel-connected boreholes is presented. Borehole wall temperature variations are obtained from the temporal and spatial superposition of the finite line source (FLS) solution. The FLS solution is coupled to a quasi-steady-state solution of the fluid temperature profiles in the boreholes, considering the piping connections between the boreholes. The dimensionless borehole wall temperatures in the bore field and the inlet fluid temperature are obtained from the simultaneous solution of the heat transfer inside and outside the boreholes. The effective borehole wall temperature (i.e., the g-function) is defined based on the dimensionless inlet fluid temperature and a newly introduced effective bore field thermal resistance. The g-function evaluation method is validated against the DST model and its use is demonstrated in a sample simulation of a seasonal thermal energy storage system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it