MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945964081 · doi:10.4000/ifha.9009

Felix Biermann, Andreas Kieseler, Dominik Nowakowski, Burg, Herrschaft und Siedlung im mittelalterlichen Niederschlesien

2018· article· de· W2945964081 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Rossignol

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2018
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Felix Biermann, l’infatigable spécialiste des sociétés slaves du haut Moyen Âge, offre ici une nouvelle publication présentant les résultats de recherches inédites sur deux fortins slaves situés sur le territoire actuel de la Basse-Silésie. F. Biermann, on le sait, a déjà publié abondamment sur les fortins slaves, avec entre autres des monographies sur les fortins de Basse-Lusace (2000), le fortin de Pennigsberg près de Berlin (2001) et celui de Sypniewo en Mazovie (2006). Dominik Nowakowski...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207