MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945969795 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.07798

Construction of irreducible polynomials through rational transformations

2019· preprint· en· W2945969795 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Panario, Lucas Reis, Qiang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsDegree (music)Finite fieldCombinatoricsIrreducible polynomialMathematicsPrime powerPrime (order theory)Field (mathematics)Divisor (algebraic geometry)PolynomialSequence (biology)Discrete mathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsMatrix polynomialMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\mathbb F_q$ be the finite field with $q$ elements, where $q$ is a power of a prime. We discuss recursive methods for constructing irreducible polynomials over $\mathbb F_q$ of high degree using rational transformations. In particular, given a divisor $D>2$ of $q+1$ and an irreducible polynomial $f\in \mathbb F_{q}[x]$ of degree $n$ such that $n$ is even or $D\not \equiv 2\pmod 4$, we show how to obtain from $f$ a sequence $\{f_i\}_{i\ge 0}$ of irreducible polynomials over $\mathbb F_q$ with $\mathrm{deg}(f_i)=n\cdot D^{i}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207