MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945971122 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190047

Increasing prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis among children in Quebec: a population-based retrospective cohort study

2019· article· en· W2945971122 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Marie‐Eve Robinson, Patricia Li, Elham Rahme, Marc Simard, Isabelle Larocque, Meranda Nakhla

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecMcGill University Health Centre
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineDiabetic ketoacidosisKetoacidosisDiabetes mellitusType 1 diabetesPediatricsPopulationIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyCohortCohort studyConfidence intervalInternal medicineEndocrinologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis at type 1 diabetes diagnosis is a preventable life-threatening complication. Canadian data on the temporal trends of the prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at the onset of type 1 diabetes in children are unknown. We aimed to determine the temporal changes in diabetic ketoacidosis prevalence at diabetes diagnosis in Quebec. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of children (aged 1-17 yr) living in Quebec who were diagnosed with diabetes between 2001 and 2014, using multiple health administrative linked databases available at the Institut national de santé publique du Québec through the Quebec Integrated Chronic Surveillance System. We used multivariate Poisson regression analysis with robust error variance to determine trends in the prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis. RESULTS: We found that 25.6% (1471/5741) of children presented with diabetic ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis. The incidence of diabetes was stable at 30 cases per 100 000 children per year during the study period. The age- and sex-standardized rates of diabetic ketoacidosis increased from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17%-26%) in 2001 to 30% (95% CI 24%-36%) in 2014. The relative increase of diabetic ketoacidosis prevalence at diabetes diagnosis over the study period was 2.0% per year (rate ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03). INTERPRETATION: Despite a stable incidence of type 1 diabetes, we found that the prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diabetes onset increased between 2001 and 2014. Our findings are concerning and demonstrate a need to continue to campaign to recognize type 1 diabetes before diabetic ketoacidosis supervenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207