MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946019462 · doi:10.1111/let.12335

<i>Diopatra cuprea</i> worm burrow parchment: a cautionary tale of infaunal surface reactivity

2019· article· en· W2946019462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLethaia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBurrowParchmentBioturbationEstuaryGeologyChemistrySedimentEnvironmental chemistryMineralogyOceanographyPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many infaunal marine invertebrates produce mucus excretions that play an important role in metal binding, authigenic mineralization and burrow stabilization. To date, only a handful of studies have characterized the functional groups that control the surface reactivity of burrow linings and backfills. This makes it difficult to place estimates on the overall impact that bioturbation has on metal cycling in tidal flats, the inner shelf, estuaries and other shallow marine environments. Here, we examined the parchment linings of Diopatra cuprea burrows from the Ogeechee River estuary near Savannah, Georgia, USA. Acid–base titrations coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy demonstrate that the parchment is essentially composed of hydroxyl (R-OH) groups, yielding total ligand densities of only 0.017 mmol/g. To place this value into context, it is orders of magnitude less than previously reported mucopolysaccharides for other marine worms, indicating that D. cuprea is essentially unreactive in the estuarine waters from which it was collected. This was corroborated by minimal Cd2+ adsorption to, and limited silicification of, pre-rinsed parchment. The lack of silica adsorption was surprising given that the parchment was generally coated with an abundance of quartz grains when extracted from the sediment. This suggests that perhaps the physical, rather than chemical, characteristics of the parchment material were responsible for this association. Indeed, scanning electron microscope images show that the parchment is fibrous and envelopes quartz grains, implying that detritus may get trapped by the parchment mesh. It appears that unlike many other infaunal mucopolysaccharide-rich linings that might be produced to provide reactive surfaces to which dissolved metal cations can adsorb for the organism's nutritional benefit, the parchment of D. cuprea may instead function to protect the animal from stresses such as predation or high-energy disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it