MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946021821 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v9n8p108

Starting the lean journey: The effect of lean awareness on nurses’ knowledge and readiness for lean transformation in the hospital

2019· article· en· W2946021821 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ebtsam Aly Abou Hashish, Nevine Hassan Abdel aal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingLean manufacturingScale (ratio)PsychologyQuality (philosophy)Intervention (counseling)Health careLean project managementMedicineBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: Lean is a form of quality improvement which receiving an increased attention and rapidly becoming the latest approach in healthcare. Lean presents a set of philosophies, principles, and tools for (re)designing hospitals to maximize value and minimize waste, improving performance and care quality. Leading the journey of Lean transformation (LT) in the nursing units is a natural role of nurses. It has been indicated that enhancing nurses’ awareness and knowledge about Lean approach is essential for increasing nurses’ readiness in order to assume an active role in LT Journey in hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of lean awareness on nurses’ knowledge and readiness for LT at a private hospital.Methods: A quai-experimental research with one group pre-post- test design was conducted with all nurses (N = 90) who are working in a private hospital, Egypt. Lean Awareness Sessions (LASs) were introduced to nurses as the study intervention. Lean knowledge questionnaire and Organizational Change Recipients’ Belief Scale were used for assessing nurses’ knowledge and their readiness for LT, respectively.Results: Nurses’ knowledge of Lean concept significantly improved after attending LASs compared with pretest knowledge questionnaire (p < .001). A strong significant positive correlation increased between overall nurses’ knowledge of Lean and their readiness for LT after attending LASs (r = 0.697, p < .001). These results prove that the knowledge nurses acquired through LASs increased their readiness in a significant way for LT.Conclusion and recommendations: For a successful transformation towards Lean hospital, significant factors should be considered by hospital and nursing managers such as: training programs, nurses’ empowerment, and effective communication. The readiness for Lean should be supported by understanding the necessity for change, having clear and endless leadership direction, and a strong change agent. Future longitudinal study may permit stronger statements regarding the causal relationship between Lean knowledge and readiness and to understand how Lean adoption impacts nurses’ outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207