MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946023914 · doi:10.1134/s1061920820040068

An Almost-Solvable Model of Complex Network Dynamics

2020· article· en· W2946023914 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Mathematical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjacency matrixOperator (biology)Complex networkDynamical systems theoryMatrix (chemical analysis)Dynamical system (definition)Variable (mathematics)Logistic functionOrdinary differential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We discuss a specific model, which we refer to as RandLOE, of a large multi-agent network whose dynamic is prescribed via a combination of deterministic local laws and random exogenous factors. The RandLOE approach lies outside the framework of Stochastic Differential Equations, but lends itself to analytic examination as well as to stable simulation even for relatively large networks. RandLOE is based on the logistic operator equation (LOE), which is a multidimensional dynamical system extending the classical logistic equation via an operator-algebraic interaction term. The network is defined by interpreting the LOE variable as an adjacency matrix of a complete graph. Depending on the choice of parameters, it can display a number of essentially distinct dynamical characteristics: e.g., cycles of expansion and contraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207