Acoustic‐Mechanical Responses of Intact and Flaw‐Contained Rock Deformation under Uniaxial Compression: A Comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the mechanical properties and cracking behaviors of jointed rock masses is important in rock engineering projects. In the present study, a series of uniaxial compression experiments were conducted on intact rock, and rock masses with single or double preexisting flaws, and then the strength, deformability, and fracture behavior of samples are investigated. Moreover, photographic monitoring technique and emission monitoring technique are introduced to explore the fracturing mode and the acoustic emission (AE) evolution characteristic of fractured rock during the whole loading process. The obtained results show that the preexisting flaw has a strong influence on the mechanical properties, fracture behavior, and AE characteristic of sandstone specimens. In detail, the stress‐strain curves show that no significant stress jump occurs at prepeak and postpeak points for intact sandstone specimens; however, the flaw‐contained sandstone specimens exhibit distinct stress jump during the entire loading process. Meanwhile, the strength parameters of the the rock specimen is obviously weakened by the preexisting fissures, and the uniaxial compression strength of rock specimens generally decreases with the increase in the number of preexisting fissure as well as the peak strain and the elastic modulus. The failure modes of intact and flaw‐contained sandstone specimens exhibit the splitting failure and the mixed failure modes of shear and tension, respectively. Similarly, the maximum AE counts and AE energy both decrease with the increasing number of preexisting flaw. The present research can enhance the understanding of mechanical properties, cracking behaviors, and failure mechanism of jointed rock mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".