The efficiency of the brain connectome is associated with cerebrovascular reactivity in persons with white matter hyperintensities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the organization of the brain connectome and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in persons with white matter hyperintensities. Diffusion tensor and CVR mapping 3T MRI scans were acquired in 31 participants with white matter hyperintensities. In each participant, the connectome was assessed by reconstructing all white matter tracts with tractography and segmenting the whole brain into multiple regions. Graph theory analysis was performed to quantify how effectively tracts connected brain regions by measuring the global and local efficiency of the connectome. CVR in white matter and gray matter was correlated with the global and local efficiency of the connectome, while adjusting for age, gender, and gray matter volume. For comparison, white matter hyperintensity volume was also correlated with global and local efficiency. White matter CVR was positively correlated with the global efficiency (coefficient: 23.3, p = .005) and local efficiency (coefficient: 2850, p = .004) of the connectome. Gray matter CVR was positively correlated with the global efficiency (coefficient: 21.3, p < .001) and local efficiency (coefficient: 2670, p < .001) of the connectome. White matter hyperintensity volume was negatively correlated with global efficiency (coefficient: -0.0002, p = .003) and local efficiency (coefficient: -0.024, p = .003) of the connectome. The association between CVR and the brain connectome suggests that impaired cerebrovascular function may be part of the pathophysiology of the disruption of the brain connectome in persons with white matter hyperintensities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".