Entre liturgie et incursions scéniques. Quand la chanson prend la parole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Édith Piaf, Germaine Montero, Rosy Varte : trois femmes proches en matière de génération, trois femmes qui laissent leur nom dans le monde de l’art et du spectacle ; trois femmes qui chantent, dans des registres socio-esthétiques fort éloignés. Piaf est une icône de la chanson. Montero se définit d’abord comme comédienne. Varte débute par le cabaret. Au regard de ces divergences, toute approche transversale est compromise. Toutefois, le passage par la notion d’interprétation chansonnière, et par un double rapprochement historique et théorique entre théâtre de la chanson et chansons du théâtre, nous permet de suivre le fil des nuances, des contrastes, voire des contradictions entre ces trois modes très singularisés d’occupation de l’espace théâtral du chant. On parlera de forme sanctuarisée dans le contexte du récital pour Édith Piaf, de forme réitérative/combative du chanter pour Germaine Montero, voix française de Mère Courage, de forme brève et corrosive pour Rosy Varte dans Ubu roi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".