Implementation of Issuance of Substitute Certificate and Legal Implications (Study at the Land Office of North Lombok Regency)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of issuance of substitute certificates and legal implications. Factors influencing the issuance of the replacement certificate because the certificate was lost and because the certificate was damaged, and the certificate still used the old certificate and the legal implications of issuing a substitute certificate.The sources of data found in this study are from interviews with the Head of the Land Law Relations Section of the North Lombok National Land Agency Office, the Head of the Land Registration Subsection of the North Lombok Regency National Land Agency and the Ganges Sector Police of North Lombok Regency.The results showed that the issuance of the Substitute Certificate and Legal Implications consisted of three stages, namely, the preparation stage of the applicant, the registration stage, the implementation stage of the certificate of replacement by the Office of the North Lombok National Land Agency. Legal implications arising from the issuance of a replacement certificate in the event of a violation of land rights can carry out prosecution of the violator based on their rights in accordance with Article 32 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration that the certificate is a strong and legal certificate. but if there is another party who feels they have the right to the land, then they may submit a written objection to the holder of the certificate and the National Land Agency or submit a complaint to the Court regarding land ownership or issuance of the certificate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".