A Conceptual Model for the Development and Persistence of Soap Holes (Unique Prairie Groundwater Discharge Features)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soap holes manifest as localized areas of water-saturated, weak sediments which render farmland uncroppable and hazardous. The formation mechanisms and global distribution are largely unknown, despite being inferred as groundwater discharge phenomena on the Alberta prairies over 50 years ago. Here, the first conceptual model for soap hole development and persistence is created using time-series hydraulic and temperature data, electrical resistivity tomography, sediment analyses, and geochemical data (sediment and groundwater) from two locations in Alberta, Canada. The soap holes developed in smectite-rich, dominantly colloidal-size glacial sediments under strong flowing artesian conditions, resulting in quick conditions and liquefaction. Geoelectric and hydraulic conductivity contrasts (2-5 orders of magnitude), as well as groundwater geochemistry, suggest preferential groundwater flow of artesian aquifer provenance through a low permeability confining layer. In addition to natural occurrences, a proportion of soap holes may be the consequence of explosive-source seismic conducted for oil and gas exploration in Alberta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".