Bibliographic record
Abstract
GANGSTER PRIEST: THE ITALIAN AMERICAN CINEMA OF MARTIN SCORSESE Robert Casillo Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006, 600 pp. Reviewed by Marc Raymond Within the critical literature on Martin Scorsese, there exists a large volume of work on his Italian Catholic background. Robert Casillo's new book Gangster Priest: The Italian American Cinema of Martin Scorsese represents by far the most comprehensive study of this topic, offering a depth missing from previous work on Scorsese's ethnicity and religion. Casillo smartly devotes most of his analysis to those films that deal with Italian culture directly, with a chapter each on six primary films: Who's That Knocking at My Door?, Mean Streets, Italianamerican, Raging Bull, GoodFellas, and Casino. There are also chapters on Scorsese as a third-generation Italian-American artist and on his pre-filmmaking life in New York's Little Italy. Casillo is clearly very well read in the history and sociology of Italian-American culture, particularly the major role of Catholicism within this cultural group. The book provides an almost overwhelming amount of detail about Italian-American history and culture culled from a large number of secondary texts. A lack of primary research makes the chapter on Scorsese's upbringing mostly a summary of previous writings, and, unfortunately, there is no bibliography to organize the extensive secondary sources Casillo draws upon. The smallest details from certain films are described, explained at great length, and included in the 161 pages of notes accompanying four hundred pages of text. Some of this material is indeed helpful in explaining the historical and sociological meaning behind references that would remain obscure to an audience not familiar with the cultural context. Indeed, Casillo persuasively argues that without this grounding in Scorsese's ethnic and religious background, a full understanding of the meaning of his films is impossible. But this approach also proves to be rather reductive, relegating the films and their multitude of meanings to a single master code. One glaring example occurs when Casillo compares two different interpretations of a sequence from Who's That Knocking At My Door?. One, Casillo claims, misinterprets the scene, the other reads the scene correctly. For Casillo, reading the films correctly means reading them exclusively from the perspective of Italian-American culture. While valid in its own way, this is hardly the only way to view a figure as assimilated as Scorsese. After all, Scorsese has spent almost his entire career as a Hollywood filmmaker. Because of his particular critical bias, Castillo's strongest chapters are on the films made outside of Hollywood: Who's That Knocking At My Door? and, especially, Italianamerican, Scorsese's documentary about his parents. It is with the latter film that Casillo's extensive knowledge of Italian-American culture is most valuable. Re-watching Italianamerican, one achieves a much deeper understanding of the subject matter, thanks to Castillo's chapter on the film. Nevertheless, Casillo's approach is rather monolithic, a weakness that becomes more serious when this reductive grid is placed over the other films. The chapter on Mean Streets shows both the strength and weakness of this approach most vividly because of the transitional nature of the film itself. Mean Streets began as the third part of a trilogy Scorsese planned at New York University in the 1960s. The script's original title was Season of the Witch, which was changed after Scorsese rewrote the script following his move to Hollywood and his first professional directing job, Boxcar Bertha (1972). Casillo explains the significance of this earlier title by detailing the specific meaning of witches and witchcraft within Italian-American culture and how the meaning of these terms differs from that in mainstream America. Casillo believes the original title to be more appropriate to the themes and narrative of the film than its revised title, and deduces that Scorsese made the change because, while witches have a specific significance in southern Italian society and its earlier Italian-American off-shoots, these meanings would have been lost on most American viewers. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".