MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946152748 · doi:10.33755/jkk.v3i1.85

HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN TENTANG ANTISIPASI CEDERA DENGAN PRAKTIK PENCEGAHAN CEDERA PADA ANAK USIA TODDLER DI RW 01 KELURAHAN MANGGAHANG WILAYAH PUSKESMAS JELEKONG KABUPATEN BANDUNG

2017· article· id· W2946152748 on OpenAlexaff
Dwi Hastuti

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Keperawatan Komprehensif · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cedera adalah dampak dari agen eksternal yang menimbulkan kerusakan fisik maupun mental. Cedera termasuk salah satu dari beberapa penyebab utama morbiditas dan mortalitas pada anak di dunia. Prevalensi cedera pada tahun 2007 mencapai 7,5% dan mengalami peningkatan tahun 2013 yaitu 8,5%. Melihat karakteristik perkembangannya toddler lebih beresiko mengalami cedera. Hal ini dapat berdampak pada psikologis, terganggunya proses pertumbuhan dan perkembangannya dikemudian hari, menimbulkan kecacatan bahkan lebih fatal bisa menyebabkan kematian. Ibu yang memiliki pengetahuan tentang antisipasi cedera akan menentukan tindakan pencegahan cedera. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan pengetahuan ibu tentang antisipasi cedera dengan praktik pencegahan cedera pada anak usia toddler di RW 01 Kelurahan Manggahang Wilayah Puskesmas Jelekong Kabupaten Bandung. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif korelatif dengan desain crosssectional, sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 79 ibu. Data diperoleh secara langsung selanjutnya diolah dengan analisis bivariate yaitu Chi-Square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagian ibu berpengetahuan cukup tentang antisipasi cedera (44,3%). Hasil uji Chi-Square diperoleh adanya hubungan antara pengetahuan ibu tentang antisipasi cedera dengan praktik pencegahan cedera pada anak usia toddler di RW 01 (P value = 0,000). Disarankan para ibu untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan tentang antisipasi cidera sehingga ibu dapat melakukan tindakan dalam menjamin kesehatan, keamanan, dan keselamatan anak dalam beraktifitas sehingga anak terhindar dari bahaya cedera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Keperawatan KomprehensifSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207