Politicizing Islam: The Islamic Revival in France and India
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Politicizing Islam, Z. Fareen Parvez offers a timely new approach to studying Islamic revival movements in cross-national perspective. Based on two years of ethnographic fieldwork and thirty-nine interviews with Muslim activists, community leaders, politicians, teachers, and middle- and working-class residents in Lyon, France and Hyderabad, India, the study departs from previous work by attending to the social and economic—rather than simply the religious—conditions that give rise to revivalist politics. The result is a book that takes seriously the everyday practices of Muslim communities, rather than reading those practices through the discourses imposed “from above” by states. The core argument of Politicizing Islam is that states’ differing regimes of secularism have bearing on the relationships among middle- and working-class Muslims, with significant consequences for the aims, tactics, and orientations to state power adopted by Islamic revival movements. In France, Parvez argues, the predominance of an assimilationist and restrictive secularism has led middle-class Muslim organizations to direct their mobilizing efforts toward the elusive goal of obtaining state recognition of Islamic religious beliefs and practices. This narrow emphasis on recognition has in turn inhibited the pursuit of a radical redistributive agenda, ultimately sullying inter-class relations. Isolated from their middle-class counterparts, subaltern Salafist Muslims inhabiting impoverished city suburbs have responded by adopting what Parvez calls an “antipolitics”: a political practice that focuses on faith and self-protection, and seeks to expand the boundaries of the private sphere against an intrusive state. In India, by contrast, where the government has pursued a pluralist and flexible secularism, middle- and working-class Muslims have joined together in a project to achieve greater economic redistribution. Through cross-class coalitions, subaltern Muslims in that setting have succeeded in forging political communities—sustained to a large extent by women—that alleviate poverty without demanding resources from the state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it