MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946190096 · doi:10.3138/cras.2018.017

The World of the Fathers: Hawthorne in “The Custom-House”

2019· article· en· W2946190096 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marty Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Sexual Relationships
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceDescent (aeronautics)LiteratureArt historyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s essay “The Custom-House” takes the form of a classic nekuia, a descent into the underworld to confront the dead but commanding father and redeem a saving cultural message or vision. The custom house is the setting for this journey, which takes the form of a series of spectral encounters. Hawthorne refuses to acknowledge the initial supplicants (King Derby, and John and William Hathorne) but acquiesces to the demands of a third, Surveyor Pue. As is well-known, the essay has a problematic relationship with the romance that follows it. For one thing, the Hawthorne of “The Custom-House” is a spent force, a failed romancer. In The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne both defies his Puritan ancestors and accedes to their wishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207