Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte cherche à clarifier deux concepts et leurs relations, celui d’autogouvernement et celui de gouvernance. Après une brève revue du sens de ces termes à partir de leurs usages, on revient brièvement sur un débat antérieur, concernant l’autorégulation dans le champ de l’éthique appliquée, dans le but de mieux saisir les limites du concept d’autogouvernement. On se demandera ce que suppose une telle expression d’un point de vue qui se veut réaliste. Suite à une explication du sens des expressions « philosophie pratique » et « adaptation aux changements climatiques », l’article présente un projet de recherche-action en gouvernance de l’adaptation aux changements climatiques au niveau régional, dans la MRC de Memphrémagog au sud du Québec, en se demandant en quoi il est possible de parler d’autogouvernement dans ce cas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".