MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946248884 · doi:10.1029/2019ja026529

Flow Velocity and Field‐Aligned Current Associated With Field Line Resonance: SuperDARN Measurements

2019· article· en· W2946248884 on OpenAlexaff
F. R. Fenrich, D. M. Gillies, E. Donovan, D. J. Knudsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField lineResonance (particle physics)Field (mathematics)Vector fieldPhysicsGeophysicsCurrent (fluid)Line (geometry)IonosphereMagnetosphereMagnetic fieldGeodesyGeologyComputational physicsGeometryMechanicsAtomic physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study presents observations of the two‐dimensional velocities and field‐aligned currents of magnetospheric field line resonances. Knowledge of the two‐dimensional plasma flows is essential for determining the field‐aligned current structure of the field line resonance and for understanding the role that field line resonances play in the generation of some auroral arc forms. In this work the full velocity vectors are determined from a high‐resolution fit to the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) line‐of‐sight data. Two discrete field line resonance events are presented, one at 4.0 mHz (4‐ to 5‐min period) and the other at 0.6 mHz (30‐min period). Band‐pass filtering the north‐south and east‐west components of the total convection velocity vectors reveals the two‐dimensional velocity field specific to an individual field line resonance. The field line resonance velocities exhibit periodic vorticity, which correspond to periodic poleward moving bands of enhanced field‐aligned current. Assuming a constant ionospheric Pedersen conductance of 10 S, peak field‐aligned current values are estimated to be 2–4 μA/m 2 . The field‐aligned currents alternate between upward and downward directed and peak in magnitude ~0.5–1° poleward and/or equatorward of the peak in field line resonance flow velocity. A Swarm satellite overpass occurs directly over the 0.6‐mHz field line resonance. The SuperDARN field‐aligned current profile along the Swarm trajectory is found to be similar in magnitude and structure to that determined from Swarm‐A and Swarm‐C in situ measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207