MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946252593 · doi:10.1177/1350650118806374

Analytical analysis of a rigid rotor mounted on three hydrostatic pads lubricated with micropolar fluids

2018· article· en· W2946252593 on OpenAlexaff
Aboubakeur Benariba, Ahmed Bouzidane, Marc Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part J Journal of Engineering Tribology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrostatic equilibriumMechanicsDimensionless quantityRigid rotorRotor (electric)LubricantLubricationReynolds equationMaterials scienceAmplitudeReynolds numberPhysicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytical analysis of rigid rotor set vertically, supported by a new hydrostatic squeeze film damper consisting in three hydrostatic pads fed through three capillary restrictors operating with micropolar lubricant is presented. The modified Reynolds equation is obtained using the micropolar lubrication theory and solving it analytically. The calculation of the flow rate, dimensionless vibratory amplitude and amplitude of transmitted forces are determined by resolving the equations of rotor motion using nonlinear methods. It has been observed that a rigid rotor operating with micropolar lubricant shows an increase in the value of transmitted forces at high speeds and a reduction in the value of vibratory response at critical speed when compared to a corresponding similar rigid rotor operating with Newtonian lubricant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part J Journal of Engineering TribologySame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207