MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946276032 · doi:10.1155/2019/6031842

The 3D Nonstationary Creep Constitutive Model of Sandstone Based on Fractional Order

2019· article· en· W2946276032 on OpenAlexaff
Shuguang Zhang, Wenbo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCreepGeotechnical engineeringConstitutive equationNonlinear systemGeologyMechanicsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringFinite element methodComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on nonlinear creep characteristics of rock, triaxial creep tests were conducted on sandstone by using an MTS812.02 test machine. The creep properties of rocks under different conditions were analyzed. Establishing a creep model that describes parameter degradation is necessary to address the deterioration of rock creep parameters over time. A nonstationary Abel pot was constructed on the basis of laws of damage accumulation and deterioration. Then, the nonstationary creep model was established according to fractional order theory. The parameters of the triaxial creep test curve under different confining pressures were identified on the basis of Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm in Hengda coal mine in Fuxin, China. By comparing the model curve with the experimental curve, we found that the nonlinear model not only accurately reflected the creep characteristics of the decay and steady creep stages but also overcame the limitation of traditional creep model, that is, difficulty in describing the accelerated creep. Finally, the influence of fractional order and nonstationary parameters on rock creep was obtained by parameter sensitivity analysis. Overall, the model had high fitting degree as well as good prediction and analysis for 3D creep test data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Problems in EngineeringSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207