Gymnastic-Based Movement Therapy for Children With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: Results From a Pilot Feasibility Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Developmental and behavioural issues often limit the participation of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) in community-based activities with their peers, which decreases opportunities for their social learning and development. Parents of children with NDD seek out programs that address physical and psychosocial development, and more research is needed on the outcomes associated with this participation. In the planning stage of a large prospective study to assess the effectiveness of physical activity programs we reviewed the records of children who participated in a gymnastic-based, one to one, child-centred program, the Empowering Steps Movement Therapy (ESMT) to explore the potential benefits for children with NDD and their families. Design: This is a historical cohort: the files of 67children with NDD were examined across a 2-year period (Jan 2011 to Jan 2013). As part of standard practice, the ESMT therapists document changes in motor function every 6 months, using the ESMT’s proprietary motor scale. Parents also completed a parental questionnaire in June 2011 regarding their perceptions of changes in their child’s physical and psychosocial function, as well as family functioning since their child started the ESMT program. Results: Linear Mixed Effects Model showed an average monthly change in motor function score during the two-year study of 1.30 (95% CI: 0.95-1.6); p<0.0001, independent of age at first assessment, type of diagnosis, baseline score and duration of previous exposure to the program. Parental questionnaires (n=39) reported improvement in most of the children’s physical and psychosocial abilities; they also indicated improvement in most of the family parameters. There was no association between the changes in children’s motor functions and parents' responses to the questionnaire. Conclusion: Despite the limitations due to the retrospective nature of the study, the absence of a control group and the absence of validated measurement tools, the association between children's ESMT program attendance and motor performance and psychosocial development warrants further, rigorous investigation using validated instruments, independent assessors and control groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".