MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946316719

The importance of inter-collegial relationships for the wellbeing of female academics

2018· article· en· W2946316719 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn Thomas, Dawn Garbett

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)Higher educationWell-beingPsychologyPublic relationsMedical educationPedagogySociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceMedicinePsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research examines the benefits of a strong and supportive inter-collegial relationship that developed between two female academics in education as a result of prolonged site visits during sabbatical leaves from their prospective universities. Using self-study methodology and exploring the use of anticipatory reflection to help us to imagine and achieve goals of leading sustainable and fulfilling academic lives, we have learned to pay attention to our emotional selves and well-being within our professional roles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207