On the Design of Target Beampatterns for Differential Microphone Arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential microphone arrays (DMAs) have many interesting properties and have been widely used in acoustic, audio, and speech applications. A critical part of a DMA is the differential beamformer, which is generally designed in two important steps: 1) specifying a target beampattern based on what differential sound pressure field the DMA is expected to respond to and 2) designing the differential beamforming filter so that the resulting beampattern matches the target one. Most efforts in the study of DMAs so far have focused on the second step while choosing one of the limited patterns available in the literature as the target beampattern. Since it governs how the array performs, how to design the target beampattern is an important problem, which this paper addresses. The major contributions of this paper consists of the following four aspects. First, a positive superposition theorem is presented, which shows that the linear combination of effective beampatterns with non-negative coefficients is always an effective beampattern. Second, we propose a general approach to the design of target DMA beampatterns based on the positive superposition theorem. Third, an overview of the classical target beampatterns is provided and discussion is made on how to form effective base patterns. Fourth, we show that the smallest first null of a DMA is π(2N) with N being the DMA order, which provides the rule of setting nulls in practice. Finally, with examples, we show that with the use of the alternating-direction-method-of-multipliers algorithm, the proposed approach is able to generate useful DMA target beampatterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".