MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946350230

LE STATUT DES LANGUES AUTOCHTONES AU CANADA : LE CAS DE L’INUIT AU NUNAVUT

2009· article· fr· W2946350230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
André Braën

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionPolitical scienceLegislationJurisdictionEthnologyLegislaturePopulationPromotion (chess)GeographyLawHistorySociologyPoliticsDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Along with Quebec, Nunavut shares the characteristic of being inhabited by a majority population that speaks a language other than English. Recently, the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut enacted two pieces of legislation dealing with official languages and the promotion of the Inuit language. To what extent can this territory adopt measures to promote the language of the majority of its inhabitants? To answer this question, the author begins by analyzing the linguistic jurisdiction of the federal and territorial parliaments. Next, he discusses the special status the Canadian constitution attributes to aboriginal languages, and their relationship to the country’s two official languages. Lastly, he analyzes Nunavut’s new linguistic regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207