Winter Wheat Canopy Height Extraction from UAV-Based Point Cloud Data with a Moving Cuboid Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant height can be used as an indicator to estimate crop phenology and biomass. The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based point cloud data derived from photogrammetry methods contains the structural information of crops which could be used to retrieve crop height. However, removing noise and outliers from the UAV-based crop point cloud data for height extraction is challenging. The objective of this paper is to develop an alternative method for canopy height determination from UAV-based 3D point cloud datasets using a statistical analysis method and a moving cuboid filter to remove outliers. In this method, first, the point cloud data is divided into many 3D columns. Secondly, a moving cuboid filter is applied in each column and moved downward to eliminate noise points. The threshold of point numbers in the filter is calculated based on the distribution of points in the column. After applying the moving cuboid filter, the crop height is calculated from the highest and lowest points in each 3D column. The proposed method achieved high accuracy for height extraction with low Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 6.37 cm and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 5.07 cm. The canopy height monitoring window for winter wheat using this method starts from the beginning of the stem extension stage to the end of the heading stage (BBCH 31 to 65). Since the height of wheat has limited change after the heading stage, this method could be used to retrieve the crop height of winter wheat. In addition, this method only requires one operation of UAV in the field. It could be an effective method that can be widely used to help end-user to monitor their crops and support real-time decision making for farm management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".