MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946398113 · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1686649

Baseline-Charakteristika von Patienten mit chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit nasalen Polypen (mit und ohne Asthma) in SINUS-52, einer randomisierten, doppel-blinden, Phase-3-Studie von Dupilumab

2019· article· de· W2946398113 on OpenAlexaff
Claus Bachert, Martin Desrosiers, Joaquim Mullol, J.F. Maspero, Martin Wagenmann, Isa Niemann, Asif Khan, Siddhesh Kamat, Nikhil Amin, L. Mannent

Bibliographic record

VenueLaryngo-Rhino-Otologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDupilumabMedicineChronic rhinosinusitisAtopic dermatitisDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) ist eine vorwiegend Typ-2-vermittelte Erkrankung mit hoher Symptomlast u. schlechter Lebensqualität. Dupilumab, ein humaner IL-4Rα-mAb, inhibiert die für die Typ-2-Entzündung zentralen Zytokine IL-4/IL-13 und ist bei Erwachsenen für unkontrollierte mittlere bis schwere atopische Dermatitis sowie in den USA für Patienten (Pat) ab 12 Jahren für mittleres bis schweres eosinophiles oder Steroid-abhängiges Asthma indiziert. In einer Phase-2a-Studie verbesserte Dupilumab endoskopische, radiologische, klinische u. subjektive Beschwerden in CRSwNP Pat. Wir präsentieren Baseline-Charakteristika von CRSwNP-Pat unter täglichen nasalen Steroiden aus der neuen Dupilumab Phase-3-Studie (SINUS-52; NCT02898454).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaryngo-Rhino-OtologieSame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207