MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946420757 · doi:10.5897/ajps2019.1783

Genetic diversity, variability and characterization of the agro-morphological traits of Northern Ghana Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var. altissima) accessions

2019· article· en· W2946420757 on OpenAlexaff
Yaqueline Antonia, A. Ankrah Nii, Coffie Nancy, Niagiah Achana

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Plant Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicHibiscus Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
FundersKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsBiologyHibiscus sabdariffaGenetic diversityCropPopulationHorticultureAgronomyTraitBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var. altissima), a bast fibre crop adapted to the warm climate of Northern Ghana, offers a great economic potential not yet explored for lack of information on its distribution, collection, and genetic diversity. Little variability is reported in exotic genotypes to merit trait improvement. The objective of this study is to investigate distribution and diversity in roselle of Northern Ghana. Twenty-five accessions collected from seven districts were field evaluated in a 5×5 lattice square design in three replications at twelve qualitative and five quantitative morphological traits. Data were analysed for within- and between-population variability and multivariate analysis. Large within-population variability of SDI 0.72 to 0.87 was identified in accessions of Kassena-Nankana East district. The most variable traits, plant height and branch number, varied from 184 cm to 284 cm with six accessions HA-44, HA-47, HA-43, HA-38, HA-52, and HA-42 having the tallest plants and least basal branching of four. Mean flowering time was between 96 and 104 days. Mean Euclidean distance of 3.03 ± 0.90 ranged from 0.41 to 5.17. Based on means across pairwise distances of 2.22 and 3.94, three accessions were divergent, namely, HA-61 (3.94), HA-57 (3.66) and HA-59 (3.63). Clustering and principal components analyses delineated three distinct groups. The first three PCs explained 100% of the variance. The ample diversity in roselle awaits exploitation for genetic improvement, particularly for fibre yield. Key words: Bast fibre crop, cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, genetic diversity, morphology, PCA, roselle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicHibiscus Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207