L’Habiter durable : du détournement philosophique à travers les images et les récits médiatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte éclaire la récupération médiatique effectuée par la publicité autour du concept d’habiter abordé par la phénoménologie. En effet, la communication publicitaire semble jouer et se jouer des approches présentiste (tout relève du ici et maintenant) et constitutiviste (tout est construit en acte par l’habitant hors d’une quelconque objectivation rationnelle de la réalité) développées par ce courant philosophique pour en détourner les valeurs positives au regard des habitants de nos sociétés contemporaines. Sous les vocables projet, intentionnalité, authenticité, habiter, la publicité met en scène et en récit l’individu éco-responsable de la nature et du monde qu’il construit, qu’il invente ici et maintenant en fictions pour les générations futures ! Elle valorise alors subtilement les choix « d’acteurs » en rendant prétendument à l’habitant sa puissance réflexive de décision, de démocratie, alors qu’à travers son message même, elle le dépossède déjà de son esprit critique pour le conformer à un contexte ambiant techniciste plus préoccupé de progrès que de réflexivité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".