Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Special Edition of Critical Social Work is a collection of papers from the Annual conference (2002) of the Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work held in Toronto. The theme of the conference was “Anti-Oppressive Practice and Global Transformation: Challenges for Social Work and Social Welfare”. The papers presented here explore how the conceptual ideas of anti-oppressive practice can contribute to social work practice at the individual, community and societal levels. They examine the social work profession from two angles: first, what can social workers do to challenge oppression, and secondly, how do social workers inadvertently perpetuate the oppression of people. Clearly, social workers must not only explore new theories and methods to improve anti-oppressive practice, but we must critically examine the work that we may be doing that contributes further to the oppression of the people we intend to help.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".