MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946493923 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-bsci.13

13 A year of acute myocarditis in northern alberta

2019· article· en· W2946493923 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emer Sonnex, Richard Coulden

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisCardiologyInternal medicineTroponinDilated cardiomyopathyChest painCardiomyopathyPericardial effusionTroponin complexMyocardial infarctionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Acute myocarditis (AM) is a major cause of troponin positive chest pain in patients without obstructive coronary disease. Many cases relate to viral infection. Drug toxicity, alcohol and auto-immune diseases have also been implicated. Diagnosis is difficult and cardiac MR (CMR) can confirm/exclude the diagnosis. We reviewed all cases of suspected AM referred for CMR in 2017. Methods Patients were identified from referral information recorded in the CMR daybook. All cases underwent pre- & post-contrast imaging to assess bi-ventricular function, myocardial oedema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Results Of 1753 adult patients undergoing CMR, 95 (5%) were for suspected myocarditis. 37 had no troponin rise or peak troponin I < 0.5µg/L (normal range ≤ 0.15µg/L). None of these had AM by MRI criteria (15 dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 pericarditis, 1 LV hypertrophy and 20 normal). Of the remaining 58, 31 showed edema and LGE typical of AM and 9 had non-ischemic LGE suggesting possible myocarditis. 9 patients had acute infarcts and 9 were normal. Seven of the normal patients had troponin I rise of <2 µg/L. Conclusion Suspected acute myocarditis is a common indication for CMR. None of our cohort had a positive CMR for AM if troponin I was < 0.5µg/L. The demographics of positive cases mirrors previous series in terms of age and gender. Interestingly, the majority of positive AM cases had normal bi-ventricular function (26/40 or 65%). Longterm outcome of these patients has yet to be established and routine follow-up CMR may not be needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207