MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946574388 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2019.2916280

Economically Optimal MS Association for Multimedia Content Delivery in Cache-Enabled Heterogeneous Cloud Radio Access Networks

2019· article· en· W2946574388 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Liu, Yiqing Zhou, Jinhong Yuan, Ying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkCloud computingQuality of serviceRadio access networkWireless networkWirelessBase stationMobile stationTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cache-enabled heterogeneous cloud radio access networks (HC-RANs), mobile station (MS) association for multimedia content delivery should consider both the content caching location and the wireless channel quality. This paper studies economically optimal MS association to tradeoff the cache-hit ratio and the ratio of MSs with satisfied quality of service (QoS). When the associated enhanced remote radio unit (eRRU) stores the requesting content, the content can be fetched directly from the local cache. Otherwise, fronthaul has to be used to fetch the content. The use of fronthaul resource and cache is treated as costs, and payments of QoS-satisfied MSs are treated as incomes. Thus, the economic MS association is formulated as an optimization problem to maximize the system utility, i.e., total profit of the network operator, which is defined as the difference between incomes and costs. A belief propagation-based method is employed to solve the problem on a developed factor graph. Simulation results show that the proposed economically optimal MS association achieves much higher profit than the existing schemes and works well in the network with various loads. Moreover, the profit of the proposed scheme can be improved with inter-cell interference coordination. For the case with extremely skewed content popularity, the proposed scheme can avoid MS overloading at eRRUs storing most popular multimedia contents. Furthermore, it can support more MSs with satisfied QoS, which leads to a higher profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in CommunicationsSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207