β-Actin and Nuclear Myosin I are responsible for nucleolar reorganization during DNA Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During DNA Repair, ribosomal DNA and RNA polymerase I (rDNA/RNAP1) are reorganized within the nucleolus. Until now, the proteins and the molecular mechanism governing this reorganisation remained unknown. Here we show that Nuclear Myosin I (NMI) and Nuclear Beta Actin (ACTβ) are essential for the proper reorganisation of the nucleolus, after completion of the DNA Repair reaction. In NMI and ACTβ depleted cells, the rDNA/RNAP1 complex can be displaced at the periphery of the nucleolus after DNA damage but cannot re-enter within the nucleolus after completion of the DNA Repair. Both proteins act concertedly in this process. NMI binds the damaged rDNA at the periphery of the nucleolus, while ACTβ brings the rDNA back within the nucleolus after DNA repair completion. Our results reveal a previously unidentified function for NMI and ACTβ and disclose how these two proteins work in coordination to re-establish the proper rDNA position after DNA repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".