MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946622927 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.184

IoT-based predictive maintenance for fleet management

2019· article· en· W2946622927 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Killeen, Bo Ding, Iluju Kiringa, Tet Yeap

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer sciencePredictive maintenanceInternet of ThingsArchitectureFleet managementBig dataWork (physics)Machine learningComputer securityData miningReliability engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) and big data have been hot topics. With all this data being produced, new applications such as predictive maintenance are possible. Consensus self-organized models approach (COSMO) is an example of a predictive maintenance system for a fleet of public transport buses, which attempts to diagnose faulty buses that deviate from the rest of the bus fleet. The present work proposes a novel IoT architecture for predictive maintenance and proposes a semi-supervised machine learning algorithm that attempts to improve the sensor selection performed in COSMO. With the help of the Société de Transport de l’Outaouais, a minimally viable prototype of the architecture has been deployed and J1939 sensor data have been acquired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207