MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946666927 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v9i1.4185

Wikimedica: une Plateforme Collaborative de Transfert des Connaissances Médicales en Libre Accès

2019· article· fr· W2946666927 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Antoine Mercier-Linteau

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWikis in Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La médecine moderne ne peut plus se pratiquer sans l'aide de bases de connaissances cliniques. Or, toutes celles disponibles sont payantes et fermées et s'il est un domaine qui pourrait bénéficier d'un accès libre à de l'information fiable, de qualité et à jour, c'est celui de la santé. Wikimedica (http://wikimedi.ca) est une plateforme libre accès conçue à cette fin qui permet tant aux cliniciens de terrain qu'aux étudiants de collaborer dans la création et l'amélioration des connaissances essentielles à leur professions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicWikis in Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207