MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946681159 · doi:10.1039/c9cp01516g

Fundamental crystal field excitations in magnetic semiconductor SnO<sub>2</sub>: Mn, Fe, Co, Ni

2019· article· en· W2946681159 on OpenAlexafffund
Brett Leedahl, Daniel J. McCloskey, Danil W. Boukhvalov, Ivan S. Zhidkov, Andrey I. Kukharenko, E.Z. Kurmaev, S. O. Cholakh, Н. В. Гаврилов, V. Brinzari, A. Moewes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical ImagingUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Science FoundationUral Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesCanadian Light Source
KeywordsDopantCrystal (programming language)Condensed matter physicsElectronic structureResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringMaterials scienceElectronScatteringCrystal structureInelastic scatteringChemistryCrystallographyDopingInelastic neutron scatteringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Directly measuring elementary electronic excitations in dopant 3d metals is essential to understanding how they function as part of their host material. Through calculated crystal field splittings of the 3d electron band it is shown how transition metals Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni are incorporated into SnO2. The crystal field splittings are compared to resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) experiments, which measure precisely these elementary dd excitations. The origin of spectral features can be determined and identified via this comparison, leading to an increased understanding of how such dopant metals situate themselves in, and modify the host's electronic and magnetic properties; and also how each element differs when incorporated into other semiconducting materials. We found that oxygen vacancy formation must not occur at nearest neighbour sites to metal atoms, but instead must reside at least two coordination spheres beyond. The coordination of the dopants within the host can then be explicitly related to the d-electron configurations and energies. This approach facilitates an understanding of the essential link between local crystal coordination and electronic/magnetic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207